Bob's ACL WWWBoard On-Line Knee Library |
Click here to return to the subsection Evaluation of the Reconstructed Knee.
------
Document Title: Westin-AJSM-Jul99
Article Title: Rigorous statistical reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing of the Cincinnati knee rating system in 350 subjects with uninjured, injured, or anterior-cruciate-ligament-deficient knees
Author: Sue D. Barber-Westin
Publication: The American Journal of Sports Medicine
ISSN: 03635465
Date: July-August 1999.
(Figures included. Reference-denoting numbers appear in the same point size as document text.)
Note: Figures proffered in large format. For printing, you may wish to select landscape printing or use ledger-sized paper.
Volume: 27
Issue: 4
Pages: 402-416
Key Words: Knee, statistical analysis, sports medicine
ABSTRACT
Although many instruments are used to assess outcome after knee ligament reconstruction, their reliability, validity, and responsiveness have not been adequately proven. Our purpose was to assess these statistical measures in a commonly used instrument, the Cincinnati Knee Rating System. Reliability was determined from the responses of 100 subjects who completed the instrument twice, a mean of 7 days apart. Validity and responsiveness were assessed from 250 patients observed for at least 2 years after autogenous ACL reconstruction. Questionnaire items included symptoms, functional limitations with sports and daily activities, patient perception of the knee condition, and sports- and occupational-activity levels. The items demonstrated high test-retest reliability, supporting their use in evaluating groups of patients between two different treatment periods (all intraclass correlation coefficients >0.70). In addition, the questionnaire demonstrated good content validity, construct validity, and item-discriminant validity. For the overall rating score, no "floor effects" (worst score possible) were found before or after surgery. No "ceiling effects" (best score possible) were found before surgery, and, at follow-up, these effects were calculated in only 22 patients (9%). The questions were found to be highly responsive to detecting changes between evaluations. The data demonstrated that this rating system has acceptable reliability, validity, and responsiveness for use in outcome studies after knee ligament reconstruction.
To access the full text of this article, please click here.
There is no charge for viewing articles. However, a password is required.
If you do not already have a password, please e-mail Michael Frind at frind@execulink.com for one.
Prior to requesting a password, please make certain you have read the
Site Terms of Use
pertaining to this site.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Copyright American Journal of Sports Medicine July/August 1999. For details regarding copyright as it applies to this page, please visit the page entitled "Site Terms of Use and Aspects of Copyright" on this site.
This website was created for the benefit of the world's largest knee-injury community, Bob's ACL WWWBoard, accessible to everyone at http://factotem.org.
Documents posted on this site serve merely as a virtual library, and are intended solely for purposes of making access to high-quality peer-reviewed medical journals convenient for everyone. Knee-injury patients are hereby encouraged to discuss this material with their respective medical teams.
Click here to return to the Main Entrance Page of the Knee Library.
Looking for the Main Index Page of Bob's ACL WWWBoard? Click here!
To find recent postings on Bob's ACL WWWBoard, use the Search Engine.
To find older postings on Bob's ACL WWWBoard, use the On-Line Archive.
Site Terms of Use and Aspects of Copyright