Bob's ACL WWWBoard On-Line Knee Library |
Click here to return to the subsection Knee-Injury Diagnostics.
Click here to return to the subsection Articular Cartilage, Bone Bruising, and Chondrosurgery.
Click here to return to the subsection Patellofemoral Pain, Chondromalacia, Patellar Dislocation, Patellar-Tendon Disruption.
------
Document Title: Wright-CORR-Jan06.shtml
Article Title: Radiographs Are Not Useful in Detecting Arthroscopically Confirmed Mild Chondral Damage
Authors: Wright, Rick W MD; Boyce, Robert H MD; Michener, Todd MD; Shyr, Yu PhD; McCarty, Eric C MD; Spindler, Kurt P MD
Publication: Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research
Date: January 2006
Volume 442, pages 245-251
Keywords: X-ray diagnostics, mild chondral damage, chondromalacia, diagnosis
(Reference-denoting numbers appear in the same font and point size as the document text. As with all Knee Library documents, this article is provided in full-text form, complete with all figures and tables.)
Comments: This study shows that plain X-rays are not useful for ascertaining mild articular-cartilage damage (e.g. as present in chondromalacia).
Abstract
Preoperatively predicting chondral damage is important. Weightbearing radiographs, including the standing antero- posterior and 45° flexion posteroanterior views traditionally have been used for this purpose. We wanted to determine if one radiograph had superior sensitivity or specificity in detecting arthroscopically confirmed Grade II chondromalacia (mild arthritis). A standard prospective standing radio- graphic protocol was designed for all patients who presented to a sports medicine center with knee complaints. Patients who had subsequent arthroscopic surgery had their radiographs measured in a blinded manner for articular cartilage intervals in millimeters to detect joint-space narrowing. Intraarticular chondral damage was correlated with the radio- graphic findings. Three hundred forty-nine of a possible 411 (87%) patients during a 2-year period had both radiographs and subsequent arthroscopic grading of chondromalacia. This has been the largest study that correlated arthroscopic chondromalacia grades with two commonly preferred weightbearing radiograph projections. Despite specificities greater than 90%, the sensitivity was extremely low and neither standing radiograph was superior. Neither radiograph was useful in detecting Grade II chondral damage.
Level of Evidence: Diagnostic study, Level I-1 (testing of previously developed diagnostic criteria in series of consecutive patients-with universally applied reference “gold” standard).
To access the full text of this article, please click here.
There is no charge for viewing articles. However, a password is required.
If you do not already have a password, please e-mail Michael Frind at frind@execulink.com for one.
Prior to requesting a password, please make certain you have read the
Site Terms of Use
pertaining to this site.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Copyright Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, January 2006. For details regarding copyright as it applies to this page, please visit the page entitled Site Terms of Use and Aspects of Copyright on this site.
This website was created for the benefit of the world's largest knee-injury community, Bob's ACL WWWBoard (also known as the Kneeboard), accessible to everyone at http://factotem.org.
Documents posted on this site serve merely as a virtual library, and are intended solely for purposes of making access to high-quality peer-reviewed medical-journal articles convenient for all users of the Kneeboard. Knee-injury patients are hereby encouraged to discuss this material with their respective medical teams.
Click here to return to the Main Entrance Page of the Knee Library.
Looking for the Main Index Page of Bob's ACL WWWBoard? Click here!
To find recent postings on Bob's ACL WWWBoard, use the Search Engine.
To find older postings on Bob's ACL WWWBoard, use the On-Line Archive.
Site Terms of Use and Aspects of Copyright